1979 Abarth A 112 vs. 1952 Allard K2
To start off, 1979 Abarth A 112 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 515 kg more than 1979 Abarth A 112.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Abarth A 112 | 1952 Allard K2 | |
| Make | Abarth | Allard |
| Model | A 112 | K2 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 3622 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2700 mm |
