1979 Abarth A 112 vs. 1965 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1979 Abarth A 112 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Zastava 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Zastava 1500 weights approximately 295 kg more than 1979 Abarth A 112.
Because 1965 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Abarth A 112 | 1965 Zastava 1500 | |
| Make | Abarth | Zastava |
| Model | A 112 | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2430 mm |
