1979 Abarth A 112 vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1979 Abarth A 112 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 255 kg more than 1979 Abarth A 112.
Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Abarth A 112 | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | A 112 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1979 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2210 mm |