1979 Abarth A 112 vs. 1999 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 1,753 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 523 kg more than 1979 Abarth A 112.
Because 1999 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Abarth A 112 | 1999 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | A 112 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1999 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1753 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1208 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2540 mm |
