1979 Abarth A 112 vs. 2000 BMW Z3
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z3 weights approximately 720 kg more than 1979 Abarth A 112.
Because 2000 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Abarth A 112 | 2000 BMW Z3 | |
| Make | Abarth | BMW |
| Model | A 112 | Z3 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 2990 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 229 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1405 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2450 mm |
