1979 Alfa Romeo GTV vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Alfa Romeo GTV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Alfa Romeo GTV would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Alfa Romeo GTV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1979 Alfa Romeo GTV. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1979 Alfa Romeo GTV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 3 weights approximately 34 kg more than 1979 Alfa Romeo GTV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Alfa Romeo GTV (190 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (182 Nm). This means 1979 Alfa Romeo GTV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Alfa Romeo GTV | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
| Model | GTV | 3 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 139 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 182 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 83.1 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1134 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 55 L |
