1979 Alfa Romeo GTV vs. 2009 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Alfa Romeo GTV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Alfa Romeo GTV would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1979 Alfa Romeo GTV. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1979 Alfa Romeo GTV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 535 kg more than 1979 Alfa Romeo GTV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Alfa Romeo GTV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Alfa Romeo GTV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Alfa Romeo GTV. (190 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Alfa Romeo GTV.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Alfa Romeo GTV | 2009 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | GTV | BLS |
Year Released | 1979 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 365 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 89.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 74.8 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1635 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 58 L |