1979 Audi 100 vs. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Audi 100 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Audi 100 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1989 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Audi 100 | 1989 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 100 | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1979 | 1989 |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1910 mm |