1979 Audi 200 vs. 1963 Fiat Grand Break
To start off, 1979 Audi 200 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 2,143 cc (5 cylinders), 1979 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Fiat Grand Break weights approximately 120 kg more than 1979 Audi 200.
Because 1963 Fiat Grand Break is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Fiat Grand Break. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Audi 200 | 1963 Fiat Grand Break | |
Make | Audi | Fiat |
Model | 200 | Grand Break |
Year Released | 1979 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2143 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2660 mm |