1979 Audi 200 vs. 1963 Rover P5
To start off, 1979 Audi 200 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rover P5 weights approximately 570 kg more than 1979 Audi 200.
Because 1963 Rover P5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover P5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1963 Rover P5 has automatic transmission and 1979 Audi 200 has manual transmission. 1979 Audi 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1963 Rover P5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Audi 200 | 1963 Rover P5 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | 200 | P5 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2143 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2820 mm |