1979 Audi 200 vs. 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4
To start off, 1979 Audi 200 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 2,143 cc (5 cylinders), 1979 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Audi 200 weights approximately 135 kg more than 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4.
Because 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Audi 200 | 1964 Triumph Dove GTR4 | |
Make | Audi | Triumph |
Model | 200 | Dove GTR4 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2143 cc | 2138 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2140 mm |