1979 Audi 200 vs. 1974 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 1979 Audi 200 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 2,143 cc (5 cylinders), 1979 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Audi 200 weights approximately 44 kg more than 1974 Lotus Eclat.
Because 1974 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1974 Lotus Eclat has automatic transmission and 1979 Audi 200 has manual transmission. 1979 Audi 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1974 Lotus Eclat will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Audi 200 | 1974 Lotus Eclat | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | 200 | Eclat |
Year Released | 1979 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2143 cc | 1973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1106 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2440 mm |