1979 Audi 200 vs. 1976 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1979 Audi 200 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,143 cc (5 cylinders), 1979 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Audi 200 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1976 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1976 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Audi 200 | 1976 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | 200 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2143 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 93 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2520 mm |
