1979 Audi 200 vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,143 cc (5 cylinders), 1979 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Audi 200 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1996 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Audi 200 | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | 200 | 200 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2143 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2510 mm |