1979 Audi 200 vs. 2006 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Audi 200 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 470 kg more than 1979 Audi 200.
Because 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Audi 200 | 2006 Chrysler Crossfire | |
Make | Audi | Chrysler |
Model | 200 | Crossfire |
Year Released | 1979 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2143 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 215 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |