1979 Audi 200 vs. 2006 Ford GT
To start off, 2006 Ford GT is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Audi 200 would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford GT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford GT weights approximately 370 kg more than 1979 Audi 200.
Because 2006 Ford GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Audi 200 | 2006 Ford GT | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 200 | GT |
Year Released | 1979 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2143 cc | 5409 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 493 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1130 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2720 mm |