1979 Audi 200 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Audi 200 would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 58 kg more than 1979 Audi 200.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Audi 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Audi 200 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 200 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1979 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2143 cc | 4014 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 207 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1208 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3200 mm |