1979 Audi 200 vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Audi 200 would be higher. At 6,059 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 541 kg more than 1979 Audi 200.
Because 2009 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Audi 200 | 2009 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Audi | Dodge |
Model | 200 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1979 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2143 cc | 6059 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 419 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1691 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2950 mm |