1979 Audi 200 vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1979 Audi 200 has manual transmission. 1979 Audi 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Audi 200 | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | 200 | Epica |
Year Released | 1979 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2143 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |