1979 Audi 200 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 425 kg more than 1979 Audi 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Chevrolet Epica has automatic transmission and 1979 Audi 200 has manual transmission. 1979 Audi 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Audi 200 | 2010 Chevrolet Epica | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | 200 | Epica |
Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2143 cc | 2490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2710 mm |