1979 Audi 200 vs. 2010 Lotus Elise
To start off, 2010 Lotus Elise is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,143 cc (5 cylinders), 1979 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lotus Elise weights approximately 731 kg more than 1979 Audi 200.
Because 2010 Lotus Elise is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Lotus Elise. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Lotus Elise has automatic transmission and 1979 Audi 200 has manual transmission. 1979 Audi 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Lotus Elise will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Audi 200 | 2010 Lotus Elise | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | 200 | Elise |
Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2143 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 405 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1881 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4882 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1915 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1354 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2941 mm |