1979 Audi 80 vs. 1967 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1979 Audi 80 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 490 kg more than 1979 Audi 80.
Because 1967 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Audi 80 | 1967 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Audi | Mercury |
Model | 80 | Cougar |
Year Released | 1979 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1271 cc | 4940 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 137 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2830 mm |