1979 Audi 80 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Audi 80 weights approximately 136 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Audi 80 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Audi | Zastava |
| Model | 80 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1271 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2160 mm |
