1979 Audi 80 vs. 1992 Caterham Super 7
To start off, 1992 Caterham Super 7 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Caterham Super 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Audi 80 weights approximately 370 kg more than 1992 Caterham Super 7.
Because 1992 Caterham Super 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Caterham Super 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Audi 80 | 1992 Caterham Super 7 | |
| Make | Audi | Caterham |
| Model | 80 | Super 7 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1271 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 251 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1130 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2260 mm |
