1979 Audi 80 vs. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1530 kg more than 1979 Audi 80.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Audi 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1979 Audi 80 has manual transmission. 1979 Audi 80 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Audi 80 | 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Audi | Land Rover |
| Model | 80 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1271 cc | 2926 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2800 mm |
