1979 Audi 80 vs. 2005 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Audi 80 | 2005 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | 80 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1979 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1271 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 98 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2210 mm |