1979 Audi 80 vs. 2005 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2005 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Audi 80 would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 842 kg more than 1979 Audi 80.
Because 2005 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Audi 80 | 2005 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | 80 | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1271 cc | 3933 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 280 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1752 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2730 mm |
