1979 Audi 80 vs. 2012 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2012 Dodge Challenger is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Audi 80 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 829 kg more than 1979 Audi 80.
Because 2012 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Dodge Challenger has automatic transmission and 1979 Audi 80 has manual transmission. 1979 Audi 80 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Dodge Challenger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Audi 80 | 2012 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Audi | Dodge |
Model | 80 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1979 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1271 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1739 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5022 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1923 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2946 mm |