1979 Austin Allegro vs. 1951 Singer SM 1500
To start off, 1979 Austin Allegro is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Singer SM 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Singer SM 1500 would be higher. At 1,495 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Singer SM 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Austin Allegro weights approximately 10 kg more than 1951 Singer SM 1500.
Because 1951 Singer SM 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Singer SM 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Austin Allegro | 1951 Singer SM 1500 | |
Make | Austin | Singer |
Model | Allegro | SM 1500 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 47 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2320 mm |