1979 Austin Allegro vs. 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III
To start off, 1979 Austin Allegro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III weights approximately 330 kg more than 1979 Austin Allegro.
Because 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Austin Allegro | 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | |
Make | Austin | Austin-Healey |
Model | Allegro | 3000 Mk III |
Year Released | 1979 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 146 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2340 mm |