1979 Austin Allegro vs. 1974 Triumph Dolomite
To start off, 1979 Austin Allegro is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Triumph Dolomite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Triumph Dolomite would be higher. At 1,854 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Triumph Dolomite is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Triumph Dolomite weights approximately 98 kg more than 1979 Austin Allegro.
Because 1974 Triumph Dolomite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Triumph Dolomite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Austin Allegro | 1974 Triumph Dolomite | |
| Make | Austin | Triumph |
| Model | Allegro | Dolomite |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1854 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 948 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2460 mm |
