1979 Austin Allegro vs. 1997 Chrysler Concorde
To start off, 1997 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 3,299 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 755 kg more than 1979 Austin Allegro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Chrysler Concorde has automatic transmission and 1979 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1979 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Chrysler Concorde will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Austin Allegro | 1997 Chrysler Concorde | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | Allegro | Concorde |
Year Released | 1979 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2880 mm |