1979 Austin Allegro vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2000 Jaguar F-Type is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 950 kg more than 1979 Austin Allegro.
Because 2000 Jaguar F-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar F-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Jaguar F-Type has automatic transmission and 1979 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1979 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Jaguar F-Type will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Austin Allegro | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
| Make | Austin | Jaguar |
| Model | Allegro | F-Type |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 4194 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 390 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2390 mm |
