1979 Austin Allegro vs. 2000 Pontiac Trans Am
To start off, 2000 Pontiac Trans Am is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Pontiac Trans Am weights approximately 497 kg more than 1979 Austin Allegro.
Because 2000 Pontiac Trans Am is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Pontiac Trans Am. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Austin Allegro | 2000 Pontiac Trans Am | |
Make | Austin | Pontiac |
Model | Allegro | Trans Am |
Year Released | 1979 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 5733 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1347 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2570 mm |