1979 Austin Allegro vs. 2001 Lancia Nea

To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1979 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 1979 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Nea weights approximately 555 kg more than 1979 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Austin Allegro. (74 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Austin Allegro. 2001 Lancia Nea has automatic transmission and 1979 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1979 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lancia Nea will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1979 Austin Allegro 2001 Lancia Nea
Make Austin Lancia
Model Allegro Nea
Year Released 1979 2001
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1098 cc 2445 cc
Horse Power 44 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 74 Nm 314 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Vehicle Weight 815 kg 1370 kg
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2590 mm