1979 Austin Allegro vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,812 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 545 kg more than 1979 Austin Allegro.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Toyota Condor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Condor (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Austin Allegro. (74 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Austin Allegro | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | Allegro | Condor |
Year Released | 1979 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1812 cc |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 74 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 70 L |