1979 Austin Allegro vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Ranger weights approximately 597 kg more than 1979 Austin Allegro.
Because 2010 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Austin Allegro | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Allegro | Ranger |
Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1447 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3193 mm |