1979 Austin Allegro vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1979 Austin Allegro. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1979 Austin Allegro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Micra (108 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Austin Allegro. (74 Nm). This means 2011 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Austin Allegro | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Allegro | Micra |
Year Released | 1979 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 74 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 46 L |