1979 Austin Allegro vs. 2013 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-V is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 2,354 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Honda CR-V weights approximately 751 kg more than 1979 Austin Allegro.
Because 2013 Honda CR-V is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1979 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1979 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Austin Allegro | 2013 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Austin | Honda |
Model | Allegro | CR-V |
Year Released | 1979 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1601 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1654 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2620 mm |