1979 Austin Marina vs. 1982 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Austin Marina would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1979 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1979 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 272 kg more than 1979 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Austin Marina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Austin Marina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Austin Marina | 1982 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Marina | Cimarron |
Year Released | 1979 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1274 cc | 2844 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1152 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2580 mm |