1979 Austin Princess vs. 1980 BMW M5
To start off, 1980 BMW M5 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,453 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 BMW M5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 BMW M5 weights approximately 231 kg more than 1979 Austin Princess.
Because 1980 BMW M5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 BMW M5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Austin Princess | 1980 BMW M5 | |
| Make | Austin | BMW |
| Model | Princess | M5 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1700 cc | 3453 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 218 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1391 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2640 mm |
