1979 Austin Princess vs. 1981 Buick Skyhawk
To start off, 1981 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 175 kg more than 1979 Austin Princess.
Because 1981 Buick Skyhawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Buick Skyhawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Buick Skyhawk has automatic transmission and 1979 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1979 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Buick Skyhawk will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Austin Princess | 1981 Buick Skyhawk | |
Make | Austin | Buick |
Model | Princess | Skyhawk |
Year Released | 1979 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2480 mm |