1979 Austin Princess vs. 1986 Dodge Charger
To start off, 1986 Dodge Charger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Austin Princess would be higher. At 1,700 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Austin Princess weights approximately 110 kg more than 1986 Dodge Charger.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Austin Princess | 1986 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | Princess | Charger |
Year Released | 1979 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2460 mm |