1979 Austin Princess vs. 1995 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1995 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Austin Princess would be higher. At 1,700 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Austin Princess weights approximately 80 kg more than 1995 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Nissan Pulsar has automatic transmission and 1979 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1979 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Nissan Pulsar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Austin Princess | 1995 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Princess | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1979 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2440 mm |