1979 Austin Princess vs. 2003 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2003 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,934 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 585 kg more than 1979 Austin Princess.
Because 2003 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford Thunderbird has automatic transmission and 1979 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1979 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Thunderbird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Austin Princess | 2003 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Princess | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1979 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 3934 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 249 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2730 mm |