1979 Austin Princess vs. 2012 Dodge Avenger
To start off, 2012 Dodge Avenger is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Avenger weights approximately 474 kg more than 1979 Austin Princess.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Dodge Avenger has automatic transmission and 1979 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1979 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Dodge Avenger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Austin Princess | 2012 Dodge Avenger | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | Princess | Avenger |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1700 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 283 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1634 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4892 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2766 mm |
