1979 Austin Princess vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Austin Princess would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Mustang weights approximately 538 kg more than 1979 Austin Princess.
Because 2013 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Austin Princess | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Princess | Mustang |
Year Released | 1979 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 414 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1698 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1425 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2720 mm |