1979 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1960 Humber Super Snipe
To start off, 1979 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 846 kg more than 1979 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1960 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Autobianchi A 112 | 1960 Humber Super Snipe | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Humber |
| Model | A 112 | Super Snipe |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 2964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 124 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1506 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 72 L |
