1979 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1962 Rover P5
To start off, 1979 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Rover P5 weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1979 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1962 Rover P5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Rover P5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Autobianchi A 112 | 1962 Rover P5 | |
Make | Autobianchi | Rover |
Model | A 112 | P5 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1962 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 45 L |