1979 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1966 Jaguar 420G
To start off, 1979 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar 420G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar 420G would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar 420G is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jaguar 420G weights approximately 1118 kg more than 1979 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1966 Jaguar 420G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Jaguar 420G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Autobianchi A 112 | 1966 Jaguar 420G | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Jaguar |
| Model | A 112 | 420G |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 255 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1778 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 90 L |
